Fairness In School Sports

(F.I.S.S.)

Archive for January, 2008

FOIA REQUEST 1/31/08

   Mr. Regnier                                                                    1/31/08

I am making the following FOIA requests.

Please provide me any cost savings report produced regarding Gatehouse 1.

Additionally, please provide me a list of job descriptions and salaries of the 18.5 positions that were eliminated and referenced in the Phase I Cost Savings Report dated 11/5/2007 and presented to FCPS School Board on 11/12/2007.

Please provide a detailed account of the “travel costs” figure referenced on this report in the amount of $228,375.00.

Please provide a detailed explanation/chart of the original projected cost savings in telecommunication savings.  The savings projections for FY2006 was $118,233, for FY 2007 $245,924 and for the 33 year life cycle $14,708,470.  I basically want to see why we are not saving $14 million as originally planned.

Please indicate to me if there is any cost for this request?

Respectfully,

Mike Grasso

President

Fairness In School Sports, LTD

www.fairnessinschoolsports.org

UNSAFE PORTABLE TRAILERS

  Thanks Dean

I have a few questions.

How many portable trailers are in use today in FCPS?

What types are they, single, doubles, etc.?

What is the average age of these trailers and what is the oldest ones you have?

Please provide the location of each trailer and how many are at each location?

Regards,

Mike

In a message dated 1/30/2008 9:41:31 AM Eastern Standard Time, Dean.Tistadt@fcps.edu writes:

Mike,

Trailers in use within FCPS are secured to the ground and constructed to ensure that they remain safe in conditions such as today.  I do appreciate your interest in FCPS and the safety of our students.

Dean


From: Coachgrasso@aol.com [mailto:Coachgrasso@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 8:50 AM
To: Tistadt, Dean
Cc: fisherm@washpost.com; gpuchta1130@msn.com; tlively@washingtontimes.com; Williamsp@Washpost.com; glodm@washpost.com
Subject: Portable trailers

Mr. Tistadt

With all that is going on in the FCPS system I am still concerned with the unsafe trailers that are being used by FCPS. Even more so on a day like today when the WIND GUST will be close to 50 MPH. Hope no trailer get blown away.

Mike Grasso

BOUNDARY STUDY QUESTIONS?

  Gentleman and School Board                                                                1/31/08

I want to say thank you for having the boundary issues meetings and listening to the people of Fairfax County.

I have a few questions that I would like the answers to or please direct me to where I can locate the information.

How many boundary studies have been performed over the last ten years in FCPS and the cost for each one?

How many capital improvement projects have been performed over the last ten years in FCPS and the cost for each one?

How many boundary changes have been made in FCPS over the last ten years?

Mike Grasso 

SEXUAL MISCONDUCT PROBLEMS WITH TEACHERS

  January 27, 2008 - 2:28pm

Lawmakers say they are concerned about an increasingly well-documented phenomenon: While the vast majority of America’s teachers are committed professionals, there also is a persistent problem with sexual misconduct in U.S. schools. When abuse happens, administrators too often fail to let others know about it, and too many legal loopholes let offenders stay in the classroom.

Advocates include governors, education superintendents and legislative leaders.

“We’ve got to be on a bully pulpit with our school districts,” said Missouri state Rep. Jane Cunningham. The Republican’s legislation would eliminate statutes of limitation for sexual misconduct, allowing victims to come forward and bring charges against abusers no matter how many years had passed since the crime.

The ideas emerging in state capitals come at a time when U.S. media have been reporting steadily on individual cases, along with more in-depth examinations of the problem.

A nationwide Associated Press investigation published in October found 2,570 educators whose teaching credentials were revoked, denied, surrendered or sanctioned from 2001 through 2005 following allegations of sexual misconduct. Experts who track sexual abuse say those cases are representative of a much deeper problem because of underreporting.

There are roughly 3 million public school teachers nationwide.

In eight states, leaders pushing changes said the AP investigation had inspired their proposals. Others said they had grown concerned from individual cases of abuse in their states, or other news reports that looked at the problem locally or in their state.

In New York, Gov. Eliot Spitzer supports automatic suspension of teachers convicted of sex crimes, which now requires lengthy hearings. In Maine, Gov. John Baldacci hopes to share the names of abusive teachers with other states, which a 1913 confidentiality law there prohibits. In Florida, Gov. Charlie Crist endorsed federal legislation proposed by U.S. Rep. Adam Putnam, a Florida Republican, to create a national databank of abusive teachers, a hot line for complaints and federal funds for state investigators.

Some states are looking to increase penalties, expand background checks or broaden their ability to police charter schools for abuse, like Indiana, Massachusetts and Utah. Kentucky and South Carolina are considering making it illegal for teachers to have sex with older students.

Several states are tackling a major problem _ the loopholes that allow problem teachers to move from one school district to another, or from one state to another. The AP investigation found that what education officials commonly call “passing the trash” happens when districts allow a teacher to quietly leave a school, or fail to report problems to state authorities, or fail to check with state authorities before hiring a teacher, among other glitches.

In eight states, legislators are pursuing changes to close those gaps, including California, Colorado, Florida, Minnesota, Missouri, Virginia, Washington state and West Virginia.

“Despite acts of misconduct that were threatening and dangerous in schools, there is a track record of people going on to another school district and finding employment,” said Missouri state Senate President Pro Tem Michael Gibbons. “The new school district may get the truth, but they don’t get the whole truth about this person’s background. They may find out the dates of service, they may find out this person was dismissed, but there really is no other information forthcoming.”

His legislation aims to get school employees and districts to share all information about job-hunting teachers, including whether those educators sexually abused their students, by granting administrators civil immunity from lawsuits.

Other states approach the same problem differently. A Colorado measure being drafted would penalize school districts and state officials that fail to report problem teachers, while a West Virginia proposal would open school officials themselves to punishment. Florida would bar any confidentiality agreement between districts and teachers, and require districts to report every firing to the state.

In California, one proposal would close a loophole that bars the teacher credentialing commission from revealing the reason teachers lose their licenses if they plead no contest to an offense.

Under no contest pleas, defendants are punished as if they pleaded guilty, but retain the right to challenge the charges against them in lawsuits and other proceedings. Such deals have meant public records were unclear about why educator licenses were sanctioned in dozens of cases, the AP found.

“You should not be able to plead no contest to a sex offense just so you can continue teaching,” said state Sen. Bob Margett. The measure means teachers who plead no contest would immediately lose their license, and the reason for the revocation would be public record.

Some say the latest legislation is just the beginning.

South Carolina has created a new committee of parents, teachers, social workers and prosecutors to study the problem and come back with new ideas.

Though small statistically, the number of abusive teachers is too high, South Carolina Education Superintendent Jim Rex wrote after reading the AP report.

“I am nonetheless outraged by any incident in which an adult entrusted with the care of one of South Carolina’s students violates that student. The ramifications for that student, his or her family, and the community as a whole are painful and long lasting,” he wrote.

In Utah, the numbers of abuses flat-out shocked state Rep. Carl Wimmer. “These things happen a lot more often than parents would think,” he said. “It seems we do have an unacceptable high amount of children who get violated in the classroom. One is too many.”
(Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

His legislation aims to get school employees and districts to share all information about job-hunting teachers, including whether those educators sexually abused their students, by granting administrators civil immunity from lawsuits.

Other states approach the same problem differently. A Colorado measure being drafted would penalize school districts and state officials that fail to report problem teachers, while a West Virginia proposal would open school officials themselves to punishment. Florida would bar any confidentiality agreement between districts and teachers, and require districts to report every firing to the state.

In California, one proposal would close a loophole that bars the teacher credentialing commission from revealing the reason teachers lose their licenses if they plead no contest to an offense.

Under no contest pleas, defendants are punished as if they pleaded guilty, but retain the right to challenge the charges against them in lawsuits and other proceedings. Such deals have meant public records were unclear about why educator licenses were sanctioned in dozens of cases, the AP found.

“You should not be able to plead no contest to a sex offense just so you can continue teaching,” said state Sen. Bob Margett. The measure means teachers who plead no contest would immediately lose their license, and the reason for the revocation would be public record.

Some say the latest legislation is just the beginning.

South Carolina has created a new committee of parents, teachers, social workers and prosecutors to study the problem and come back with new ideas.

Though small statistically, the number of abusive teachers is too high, South Carolina Education Superintendent Jim Rex wrote after reading the AP report.

“I am nonetheless outraged by any incident in which an adult entrusted with the care of one of South Carolina’s students violates that student. The ramifications for that student, his or her family, and the community as a whole are painful and long lasting,” he wrote.

In Utah, the numbers of abuses flat-out shocked state Rep. Carl Wimmer. “These things happen a lot more often than parents would think,” he said. “It seems we do have an unacceptable high amount of children who get violated in the classroom. One is too many.”

CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE GROWING IN FCPS

 

 FCPS once again has failed to do their job. They need to go now.

 Click on FairfaxCAPS@.org

And read in full.

 Contact:
Jay Frost
jfrost@FairfaxCAPS.org
Phone: 571-426-6214
 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 

Fairfax Coalition of Advocates for Public Schools (CAPS) Gives Failing Grade to West County Boundary Study 

New Group Leading Fight to Keep Schools To Hold First Public Meeting at Fox Mill Elementary 

Oak Hill, Virginia – January 29, 2008 – Grassroots organizations and citizens groups banded together today to launch FairfaxCAPS—the Fairfax Coalition of Advocates for Public Schools—to combat a botched school boundary study in Fairfax County.“The West County Boundary Study is the perfect storm of bad planning and bad process resulting in a bad proposal,” said Nick Pesce, one of the founders of CAPS.    “While the Fairfax County Public Schools staff did not hear the concerns of individuals throughout the community, we are confident that the school board, upon hearing the facts, will not endorse a facilities solution to a programmatic issue.”CAPS is a coalition of civic organizations and neighborhood associations representing thousands of homeowners and parents who desire a more transparent, inclusive and democratic process for determining the direction of Fairfax County schools.  CAPS will debut in a community meeting tonight, Tuesday, January 29, 2008, at 7:00pm, at Fox Mill Elementary School.  The meeting will highlight key community concerns in advance of the School Board Public Hearings scheduled for January 30, 31 and February 9.The catalyst for CAPS’ launch was the West County Boundary Study.  The study was premised on projected under-enrollment at South Lakes High School and projected over-enrollment at Chantilly and Westfield High Schools.  In November and December 2007, FCPS held three town meetings to get public input and to consider options.  The overwhelming majority in attendance at these meetings expressed discontent with the study process, its underlying methodology, the options which resulted and the staff’s control of process to the exclusion of community input.  -       MORE   -“We founded CAPS to give voice to the majority in West County,” says Mr. Pesce.  “Despite more than 2,000 pages of meeting notes and public comments, it is clear that the community’s voice had not been heard.”  According to CAPS member Scott Chronister, “The entire West County Boundary Study process gets a failing grade.  It gets an ‘F’ for the flaws in the scope and assumptions on which the study was based, an ‘F’ for the failure to follow a prescribed process, and an ‘F’ for a faulty proposal.”Among the items to be addressed at the CAPS launch meeting on January 29, 2008, include:·         Based on FCPS’s own data, Chantilly and Westfield are not projected to have enrollment issues that would require redistricting ·         South Lakes’ under-enrollment results from program issues and not an aging population or other demographic issues·         The South Lakes International Baccalaureate (IB) program leads to more limited curriculum choices and potentially higher college costs for IB students and their familiesPesce said, “FCPS staff has distanced itself from the public opinion, the community, and most importantly, it has separated itself from the best interests of Fairfax County students.”  The Fairfax County School Board Public Hearings provide the first opportunity for School Board members to hear formal public input on the proposal.  CAPS sees the public hearings as a key forum to address the misplaced emphasis on the facilities solution to a programmatic problem and announced its recently launched website—FairfaxCAPS.org—to make available valuable information about the proposal and its impact on the kids, the community, and FCPS.   

END 

FCPS OFFICIALS DO NOT CARE ABOUT STUDENT SAFETY

  Mr. Moniuszko

Since you have not responded, I take it that you, other FCPS officials and the School Board refuse to do any background checks on a handful of people because of the expense and that it would not be warranted.

Well, that statement will stand as your decision and it will be part of your official record with FISS. You, school officials and the school board will have to live with that decision and the possibility that a student could be raped or molested by someone who did not have a background check performed based on a very small cost.

Safety of the FCPS students is not warranted at this time.

Mike Grasso

PS PLEASE SEND THIS EMAIL TO ALL, SO THAT THEY KNOW HOW FCPS REFUSES TO PROTECT OUR CHILDREN FROM RAPIST AND CHILD MOLESTERS.

In a message dated 1/25/2008 12:33:33 PM Eastern Standard Time, Coachgrasso writes:

Mr. Moniuszko

Thank you for your quick response. Sounds like I touched a nerve, sorry.

What we have been told and by documents provided by Mr. Jansen and Mr. Curran is not the same as you have indicated below. Is this a money issue with FCPS?

At your meeting last night you were spending millions of taxpayers money with no concern regarding expense.

Your statement;

“We do not believe the expense of running background checks on this handful of people is warranted”

We have been told by Jansen and Curran that some coaches, assistants and volunteers have failed back ground checks.

What would be the expense of running these checks on a handful of people?

If you caught one predator, would it not be warranted?

I am not sure who is misrepresenting who?

Our position is and always has been that all adults who come in contact with students must have background check performed.

Once again, thank you for your response. You are the one person who does respond.

Mike Grasso

In a message dated 1/25/2008 10:18:57 AM Eastern Standard Time, Richard.Moniuszko@fcps.edu writes:

  1. We do run background checks on all coaches, both paid and volunteer.
  2. The form you referenced was originally required by VHSL for all tournament workers and continues to be used only for that reason with volunteers who do not directly coach students.  These tournament workers might be assisting at a single event, such as keeping stats or timing events at a tournament. 
  3. We do allow a small number of individuals, such as former students, to attend practices and help out on occasion, but their interaction with students is very limited and they only work with students while under direct supervision of one of our coaches.

 we do not believe the expense of running background checks on this handful of people is warranted. 

Dr. Richard Moniuszko

Deputy Superintendent

Fairfax County Public Schools

8115 Gatehouse Rd.

Falls Church, VA  22042

(571) 423-1020

FCPS OFFICIALS REFUSE TO DO BACKGROUND CHECKS ON A HAND FULL OF PEOPLE IS WARRANTED

ONCE AGAIN FCPS WILL NOT INSURE THE SAFETY OF STUDENTS DUE TO EXPENSE.Mr. Moniuszko

Thank you for your quick response. Sounds like I touched a nerve, sorry.

What we have been told and by documents provided by Mr. Jansen and Mr. Curran is not the same as you have indicated below. Is this a money issue with FCPS?

At your meeting last night you were spending millions of taxpayers money with no concern regarding expense.

Your statement;

“We do not believe the expense of running background checks on this handful of people is warranted”

We have been told by Jansen and Curran that some coaches, assistants and volunteers have failed back ground checks.

What would be the expense of running these checks on a handful of people?

If you caught one predator, would it not be warranted?

I am not sure who is misrepresenting who?

Our position is and always has been that all adults who come in contact with students must have background check performed.

Once again, thank you for your response. You are the one person who does respond.

Mike Grasso

 Richard Moniuszko states,

 we do not believe the expense of running background checks on a handful of people is warranted. 

WHATS WRONG WITH FCPS?

 

I suggest you read this because this is the tip of the ice berg regarding taxpayers who are very upset with your performance.

Posted by: taxpayer (IP Logged)

Date: January 25, 2008 08:50AM

I watched the 1-24-08 meeting on the proposed CIP and the Board members are surging ahead ignoring the amendment Storck etc passed in 2007. No money is free unless it is a proffer and this South County situation has driven the finances and actions of FX for years. The School Board is supposed to manage the school division under Virginia law - Connelly and Hyland are on the Board of Supervisors and supply funds. Their names were mentioned far too often and I suspect Tisdadt and Dale cannot do their jobs. Last night Storck might have mentioned increased population on Fort Belvoir. The Fort does not attend South County. The whole thing is directed to Bradsher’s cronies at Silverbrook and even if they got 2000 middle and high school students as a result of BRAC that is no guarantee that the western point of Silverbrook would stay at South County. Over 75 million in construction because a lousy 400 kids refuse Lake braddock!!!!

 

FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST MR.CURRAN FOR FAILURE TO DO HIS JOB

    Mr. Curran                     1/24/08                                                           

What you have failed to do;

You have not been able to provide VHSL training to all FCPS coaches, assistants and volunteers.

You have not been able to provide FCPS training to all FCPS coaches, assistants and volunteers.

You have not been able to do back ground checks on all coaches, assistants and volunteers.

You have not been able to get signed contracts for all coaches, assistants and volunteers.

You have not stopped abuse of student athletics in FCPS sport programs.

You have allowed FCPS employees to break FCPS rules.

You have not answered question straight on, rather you gives half answers and protect FCPS employees.

You have failed to have any type of automated program that would provide easy status knowledge of training or background checks.

You have failed to control the misuse of FCPS fields and equipment.

You have not moved ahead with safety programs in FCPS weight rooms.

You have not eliminated the on going conflicts of interest problems in FCPS sports.

You have looked the other way when hard evidence has been given to you by parents.

Awaiting your response,

Mike Grasso

President

Fairness In School Sports, LTD

FCPS MAKE NATIONAL NEWS IN A NEGATIVE WAY

  FYI

It is 6:40 am on 1/24/08 and Fox news is providing the complete story of the now infamous phone call by one of your employees. They provided pictures of Mr. Tistadt and the entire verbal assault on a FCPS student by one of your employees.

Way to go, you may be one of the largest school systems in the nation that has made national news in such a negative way by not responding to questions from students and not dealing with employees who are out of control.

Seems like the above is how you operate. ARE YOU A GROUP OF ELITIST WHO DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE RESIDENCES WHO YOU WORK FOR?

Mike Grasso

PS THIS PROBLEM WOULD BE A GOOD ONE FOR YOUR CHANNEL 21. You could hold interviews with the student and his family and bring in all FCPS employees who were involved in this political disaster.

Next Page »